Oogy is a community-driven art collection dedicated to pushing the boundaries of creativity and innovation with a particular focus on art. The team have identified that as a species, art is the number one thing that we consume and connect with whether that be digital media, film, music, live performance or any other form it may come in. The team have honed in on art’s capacity to drive a project’s success with many popular projects being defined by art that people want to rep as a PFP. Through Oogy, the team are striving to raise the bar on PFP art standards with a unique base that isn’t the same typical animals cycled over.
The team have astutely identified the importance of driving value outside of traditional quantifiable utilities and beyond the typical friction point of being ‘just another art project’.
The Oogy collection consists of 10 000 unique PFPs with optimised trait combinations with the goal of there being no ‘ugly’ Oogies. The collection also contains 65 1/1s, each created by various well-known artists in the space including ScubaSteveArt, SCUMSOL and PencilX.
Around 50 of these 1/1s will be mintable and the rest were auctioned prior to mint. The Artists behind the 1/1s received 100% of auction proceeds and will receive 100% of the royalties.
The Founding team recently conducted an interview on the Marc Colcer Podcast in the lead up to the mint which can be viewed here.
At present, all collections under the Oogy umbrella can be found here and are:
The team is heavily focussed on driving value through their detailed and diversified PFP artwork to be a strong and reputable brand. The combination of art and strong community will look to drive the bullish narrative for the project.
Holders initially staked for an on-platform points system called Spice. This however, shifted to Spice Vessels in July 2023.
Spice Vessels are a cNFT and for now, are airdropped to delisted Oogys at a rate of 1 per week. Once Harvesting V2 is launched, NFTs will need to be staked on the platform to continue earning Spice Vessels. Additional Spice Vessels can be earned via:
Holders will be able to exchange Spice Vessels for:
At present, the Oogy team have two core software products in the works.
Part of the post-mint phase and leading into the reveal was speculation around the use case of Ooze which was airdropped to Holders. The team have stated repeatedly that ‘there will never be enough Ooze’. For now, the only utility for them to be revealed is for it to be used to allow people to re-roll their Oogy on the reveal process to try and snag a higher rarity.
Alongside the introduction of Spice Vessels, the Oogy Team launched Wheel of Oogy in July 2023. The platform allows holders to wager their Spice Vessels earned from staking for a variety of prizes.
Justin
Andrew
Bryan
I’m going to be brutally honest – Oogy have been a massive disappointment since they launched with a lot of their decision making raising various concerns which I will break down.
This was marketed as a massive revolutionary change through the use of cNFTs and for me personally, it was a nothing burger. The benefit of using a points-based system like Spice is staking for a reward that does not have a financial value tied to it. This stops potential securitisation concerns as well as ensures people don’t look at Oogy NFTs from an ROI perspective of ‘how long will it take me to earn my investment back from staking’. The introduction of cNFTs completely negates this in a move that strikes me as unnecessary given everything else they’ve launched since then could have easily utilised points as well.
One particular thing that irked me was that I could not transfer my cNFTs to a burner wallet so I could trade them on Tensor. When I opened a ticket, I was told that the tech behind cNFTs does not permit transfer which I know cannot be true because MeeJump cartridges were cNFTs and were transferable. The response caused me concern as it reflected a lack of understanding the tech.
Blasters was a huge red flag for me personally. I understand the need for the team to try and eat up the Spice that had been earned to date prior to the launch of Spice Vessels – but to use rewards earned from staking to mint something that increases rate of rewards emissions? It’s a very poor move in my opinion and simply kicks the proverbial can of managing emissions down the road.
It effectively dilutes the collection from a staking standpoint as well. At time of writing, an Oogy costs 3.9 SOL on MagicEden and will earn me 1 Spice Vessel per week. If I want to increase my emissions, I can either purchase another Oogy for 3.9 SOL OR I can purchase a Tier 3 Blaster for 0.483 SOL instead. The choice is pretty obvious.
So the Blasters have created two problems:
Just another lootbox but with a different front-end appearance.
To be fair to Oogy, everything they’ve launched, they’ve done so at a very high level. Staking interface was clean, the reveal process was absolutely stunning and their Wheel of Oogy UI is very nice. Unfortunately Oogy have been a case study for just how difficult it is for a brand-style project to capture hype and attention and then maintain it. The launch of MadLads in close proximity to their own launch probably didn’t help either.
Anyone who has read my reviews before knows I’m the furthest thing from an ‘art connoisseur’. Admittedly, I found the art a bit on the weird side when I first saw it but I think now, that was more due to it being an unrecognisable creature. As I look at the art now, the combination of being humanoid but with animalistic features that isn’t just another ape/bull/bear is growing on me.
In my opinion, the Founding team have absolutely hit the nail on the head when it comes to project valuations and utilities. Most people associate utility with revshare or access to tools/applications. This is all well and good but it means these types of projects will always have a ceiling in terms of their floor price based on how people quantify and value what they get.
The top valued projects like DeGods, y00ts, Claynosaurz, BAYC etc. all share similar characteristics in that their value isn’t based on quantifiable utilities or resources. It’s about creating the feeling of being in an ‘exclusive and prestigious community’ more than anything else. Yes, it is true that brand plays are far more speculative and trying to identify the next big thing is a high risk game, but ultimately they are the ones that will take off and reach the highs.
Do I think Oogy has what it takes? It’s hard to say. I’ve yet to get in on a brand project that took off like the others have so I wouldn’t consider myself an expert in identifying them in their early stages. That being said, I do believe the following qualities are important in assessing this:
Whilst I’m certainly not an expert, I do believe Oogy have a lot of potential to grow into a fantastic brand in the space.
I’m not overly sold on the software being built at the moment if I’m being honest. There are already several platforms trying to make exploring art and finding artists easier. Perhaps if they can get exclusivity for the many artists they collaborated with on the 1/1s, that could be what allows them to stand out amongst the rest.
As for a social media platform for Web3, I’m already someone who minimises their social media engagement for my own sanity, ESPECIALLY the crypto community on Twitter. Having a space specifically for that? Just sounds like a toxic nightmare. Would be thrilled to be proven wrong here though!
This is pure speculation on my end but I get the sense that there has to be more than that to it given the supply it has and the likelihood that not everybody will want to spend 3 SOL (current FP) to re-roll their traits. In my opinion, there will inevitably be further use cases for Ooze and I think it will make for some great game theory for those who kept their Ooze to potentially capitalise in the future.
Having watched the Founding Team’s podcast with Marc Colcer, I can honestly say I was very impressed. The three-man team are very clear about what each of them brings to the table and how they work together. Bryan in particular was fantastic to listen to. He made several points that I thought were very pertinent such as (and I’m paraphrasing):
I would strongly recommend people watch the podcast and engage with the Founders in Twitter spaces for themselves to make their own assessments but I can personally say I liked what I saw.